The problem
Patient data carries real obligations: a complete audit trail, and the ability to handle access and erasure requests. Scattered tools make both nearly impossible to prove.
The old way, and what it costs
Hoping each separate system keeps its own logs, and handling data requests manually across all of them.
Typical cost
The regulatory exposure of an incomplete trail, and consultant time when a request or incident lands.
Human cost
Days reconstructing who-did-what across tools, and manual work to fulfil a data request.
The Sulaia way
Every action is logged to one audit trail, and subject access and erasure requests are handled in one place, because the data lives in one system rather than six.
What you get
- One complete, exportable audit trail
- Access and erasure requests handled in one place
- Less exposure from scattered data